Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Uwe Dippel <udippel@uniten.edu.my> writes:
>>
>> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
>> > good.
>>
>> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
>> lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
>
> Don't be. It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a
> single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications
> other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
Ah, that must be it, then. I like k3b. Not as nice as cdbakeoven,
but cdbakeoven isn't in sid last I checked.
- --
Paul Johnson
<baloo@ursine.ca>
Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAizy6UzgNqloQMwcRAllmAJ9RAwu6xo1NaZxxBWpTJKN+uAqAVgCfaH0P
3L0bHpyi4TTOzesvP2BYm3w=
=Pz9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: