On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Uwe Dippel <udippel@uniten.edu.my> writes: > > > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so > > good. > > Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't > lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't. Don't be. It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*? Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does? Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time. -- Marc Wilson | The best diplomat I know is a fully activated msw@cox.net | phaser bank. -- Scotty
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature