[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qmail anti-virus

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> >> company).
> > 
> > This intrigues me.  Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
> Because I have one company that uses it (it also has a commercial one on all
> the desktops) and it happens (although rarely) that a new virus gets passed
> through clamav, at least that's what I hear from their sysadmin. since a
> virus inside a company network can potentially cause much more damage then
> at home I would be afraid to reccomend that to a company.

And it is caught by the commercial one?


Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
your ~/.signature to help me spread!

Reply to: