Re: qmail anti-virus
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
Because I have one company that uses it (it also has a commercial one on all
the desktops) and it happens (although rarely) that a new virus gets passed
through clamav, at least that's what I hear from their sysadmin. since a
virus inside a company network can potentially cause much more damage then
at home I would be afraid to reccomend that to a company.
> - --
> .''`. Paul Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> : :' :
> `. `'` proud Debian admin and user
> `- Debian. Because it *must* work.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----