Re: qmail anti-virus

[Haim Ashkenazi <haim@babysnakes.org>]

Paul Johnson wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
>> company).
> 
> This intrigues me.  Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
Because I have one company that uses it (it also has a commercial one on all
the desktops) and it happens (although rarely) that a new virus gets passed
through clamav, at least that's what I hear from their sysadmin. since a
virus inside a company network can potentially cause much more damage then
at home I would be afraid to reccomend that to a company.

Bye

> 
> - --
>  .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
> : :'  :
> `. `'`     proud Debian admin and user
>   `-       Debian.  Because it *must* work.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFARZGTUzgNqloQMwcRAq7sAJ9BbDXluHexObGG2W/bEi/0ia1eIQCfV7X8
> lRefq2ZajHD8CZvYyZCrhgg=
> =VxX5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----