[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: Re: Emergency braking and bird anatomy [was: Re: DVD copying and CSS]



On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:09:37AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:00:03PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It's a requirement in the UK Highway Code. While Paul decries it on
> > safety grounds, the rationale is in fact that going around the other
> > vehicle like this is safer because you can see oncoming traffic at all
> > times, instead of having to nose out with the car turning across you
> > blocking your view.
> 
> Actually, it's not usually the car coming at you that's blocking the
> view of where you're going, it's the cornerpost next to the windshield...

Recent updates of the Highway Code allow both alternatives; they point
out that offside-to-offside ("tangle") turning is safer for the reason
Colin gives, but allow the driver to judge which method to use
depending on the particular circumstances. There is a little diagram
of each method; that for nearside-to-nearside illustrates the danger
by including a cyclist coming up the inside of one of the turning
vehicles, whom the driver of the other vehicle cannot see.

-- 
Pigeon

Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F

Attachment: pgpPxN4qHD9Wb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: