Re: CPU-intensive periodic processes, e.g. xscreensaver-gl
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:11:04AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> [1] 230 mhz bus, 14% increase. Kernel compile time went from 6:11 to
> 5:20, a 14% increase. It's worth the trouble.
A separate subthread to preemptively answer the nay-sayers: I
benchmarked it non-overclocked vs. overclocked with the fan at full
speed (6400 RPMs): 45C (std) vs. 50C (clocked). I didn't measure temps
with under load with the stock fan (wish I had), but I expect it was
something like 48C (instead of the ~52C I get overclocked at "reasonably
loud" ~ 4000RPM) speeds.
Reply to: