Re: [OT[UnOfficial Unsubscribe FAQ
Nano Nano wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:18:45PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
You do not need to remove civil liberties to fight terrorism. Less
freedom does not equal more secure.
Okay, what's the plan?
Passivity, of course, is not an option. I'm gonna fight to protect
myself and my friends. Terrorists do not have any agendas except causing
terror. My plan is to just fucking ignore them (not to the point of
making yourself unable to defend yourself of course). IF they blow
themselves up, just report it as a car bombing. Don't mention what group
did what. That is exactly what they want, to be noticed. What has that
gotten us though? More bombings and terror. If we know al-Qeada is going
to try and attack the Statue of Liberty, you take steps to protect the
Statue but that's it. You don't need to strip my freedom of speech and
to move about the country anonymously to protect the Statue.
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
Student at Motlow State Community College
Political Activist Extrodinaire
The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of
horrors, the stripping of personal freedom.