Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?
Colin Watson(cjwatson@debian.org) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:47:53AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Nano Nano(40101.nospam@comcast.net) is reported to have said:
> > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2,
> > > > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells
> > > > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest
> > > > automake has aclocal-1.4.
> > > >
> > > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but
> > > > thats me.
> > >
> > > I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj
> > > and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj
> > > is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".)
> >
> > 'apt-get -s -t unstable install automake' says I have the latest version
> > and I just did an update yesterday. So SID != unstable?? Thats what
> > confused me.
>
> sid is unstable. Try the automake1.7 package; they have different names
> so that you can install multiple versions in parallel.
:-( Why didn't I look at apt-cache search automake????? Looked at
everything -but- that.
Thanks Colin. My head was up and locked, where the Sun don't shine.
Wayne
--
The program is absolutely right; therefore the computer must be wrong.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to: