Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Nano Nano(40101.nospam@comcast.net) is reported to have said:
> > Question to all: I literally specify that you need automake 1.7 and
> > autoconf 2.50: is that wise?
>
> I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2,
> which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells
> me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest
> automake has aclocal-1.4.
>
> I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but
> thats me.
>
I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj
and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj
is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".)
But when I post 0.2 that has the automake;autoconf step already run, I
expect you won't have to have the matching automake/autoconf installed;
you'll just run ./configure. I'll take a bit of time and make the
README halfway decent, because I'll need to document schema.xml before
you can use it at all.
Hang tight, and thanks for your eyes.
Reply to: