On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:05:52 +0200 Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il> wrote: > Thats some indication but what you should be looking at is the memory > usage. Here eye candy can cause a lot more cost that what shows up in > the package size. It also depends on the toolkit libraries used. > right now i've got pwm using 1.2% of 64meg, and there are no toolkit libs involved, unless you count X itself, hogging 24%. ben