Re: window manager recomendation
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 21:08, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:15:29PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:34:19 +0000
> > Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@bylands.dur.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > > PWM, or ION (pwm, ion, ion-devel packages)
> > >
> > As I suggested before, Icewm.
>
> If I reply with, 'As I suggested before, PWM.', when will it stop? :P
>
> Icewm is lovely and a bit friendlier than pwm, but not the leanest by a
> bit. Here's some sizes for reference:
>
> Package: pwm
> Installed-Size: 336
>
> Package: icewm
> Installed-Size: 1131
> Package: iceme
> Installed-Size: 296
> Package: icewm-themes
> Installed-Size: 15380
>
> Package: ion
> Installed-Size: 348
>
> Package: wmaker
> Installed-Size: 5400
>
Thats some indication but what you should be looking at is the memory
usage. Here eye candy can cause a lot more cost that what shows up in
the package size. It also depends on the toolkit libraries used.
> --
> Jon Dowland
> http://jon.dowland.name/
>
Reply to: