Re: More on spam
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:23:16 -0400,
Dave Harding <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Tom wrote:
> > I think a more precise definition might be "unsolicited commercial
> > or organizational email from a source in which I have no interest."
> > If I respect an organization, I'll read what it sends me. The
> > problem is too many organizations think they deserve my respect.
> Ok, for me, I'd chop off the last part though - "unsolicited
..chop their necks clean.
> Spammers don't want your respect, they want your money (or money
> substitute) -- even the non-profit ones.
..take the Nigerian 419's, inviting you to help pillage their countries.
Effect? DOS of all legitimate African business. Racism. Racist
warfare. For money.
..pillage is a war crime: ;-)
..so is mercenarism: ;-)
..also check the commentary link. ;-)
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.