On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:48:22AM -0400, ScruLoose wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 12:35:35AM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Colin Watson wrote: > > > > Okay, I was asking for it. :) The problem, though, is that there are > > few e-mail clients out there that understand PGP/MIME. What's worse, > > there is an e-mail client that breaks with PGP/MIME -- Outlook. > > There are some... presumably a few even under Win{dows|doze|blows}. > If people continue to use a client that refuses to handle PGP/MIME properly > (even after how long now?)... then I think it's totally valid to point out > to those people: "Your client program is rendering it wrong. This is a > bug. Report the bug, and if it doesn't get fixed find a new mail client." > > If someone's prepared to keep using Outlook in spite of its myriad other > problems (running from the merely annoying bloat to the catastrophic > security vulnerabilities) then it seems to me that adding "view attachment" > to the already-long list of Outlook annoyances is pretty minor. Er, isn't it Outlook _Express_ that isn't MIME complaint? I understood that Outlook (not the same program as OE) can handle PGP/MIME just fine, at least after changing a few settings. I don't use Outlook or Outlook Express (though I fear that may change as I transition to my new job) so I may be talking out of my ass. If so, sorry for the confusion. -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@incanus.net It doesn't matter what you are doing, emacs is always overkill. -- Stephen J. Carpenter
Attachment:
pgpYbYb35NHHT.pgp
Description: PGP signature