Re: next debian stable ?

[Deryk Barker <dbarker@turing.cs.camosun.bc.ca>]

Thus spake David Krider (david@davidkrider.com):
...
> broken. "Yeah, well that's what you get for running unstable." True, but 
> that's also the only way I can get the new features of KDE, which, it 
> may be said, I don't *have* to have, but I *like* them.

Without wishing to get into this debate, I'll just point out that you
can run KDE 3.1 with woody - my wife is doing just that.

Add http://download.us.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian/ to your
sources.list. 

I've been running unstable for 6-7 months now. I would probably have
dropped back to testing when I got my new machine just before Xmas,
but needed to unstable XFree for my video card and thought WTH?

Apart from one small libc++ glitch, I've had no real problems and run
an upgrade almost daily. Oh yes, there was a samba problem, but bny
the time I realised it was there a fixed version was available. MS
systems should be so "unstable".

-- 
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.           |
|email: dbarker@camosun.bc.ca         |                                     |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452               |         Hermann Scherchen.          |