Re: sylpheed-doc package broken?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:57:42PM -0500, ronin2@bellatlantic.net wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:21:34 +0000
> Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:
> > Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
>
> If you're saying the maintainer will ignore it, I guess that's possible.
No, I'm saying the maintainer can't do anything about it now.
> But if the maintainer is in the habit of specifying dependencies this
> way, the issue will likely return in future upgrades, unless it's fixed.
That's perhaps true, yes ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: