Re: sylpheed-doc package broken?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 04:56:35PM -0500, ronin2@bellatlantic.net wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:30:44 -0800
> Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > version of sylpheed itself. Unstable has a newer sylpheed that is
> > compatible with sylpheed-doc, but it hasn't been moved into testing
> > yet. That's what's causing your problem.
> >
> > There is no need to file a bug about this; it will resolve itself when
> > the unstable version of sylpheed gets into testing.
>
> It may resolve itself when sylpheed moves into testing, but it's still a
> bug.
Sure; not one that filing's going to particularly help, though ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: