[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mail in linux



Say hi to your friend Google: A simple search [1] returns some nice
options, e.g. [2].

Kind regards,


Auke

 1.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=pop3+delete+server
 2.  http://web.tiscali.it/marco_web/popfilter.html


On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 13:35, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> Earl F Hampton wrote:
> 
> >>i read up the documentation. from what i understand, it can not. dont
> >>you think downloading headers alone first, deleting unwanted ones off
> >>the server itself and finally downloading the required ones is a more
> >>efficient way (in terms of internet bandwidth)? is there any way of
> >>achieving it?
> >>
> >
> >I saw your msg about the checking out the headers before getting the body so 
> >I wrote a small perl script to down the headers. You can play with it if you 
> >like. For me it didn't help any because most of the mail I get is just text. 
> >The time spent opening the socket twice was longer than it took to just down 
> >the body to start with. Maybe if your spam to mail ratio is higher than mine 
> >it would help you more.
> >
> >http://hamiii.sytes.net/Scripts/Perl/index.phtml?page=popcheck.pl.html
> >  
> >
> thanx for your help. i checked the script and although i do not know 
> perl much, it was kind of easy to follow.
> 
> but i think i miscommunicated what i want to do earlier. here is what i 
> will like to to:
> 
> -    download all the headers in the pop account
> -    mark unwanted headers for deletion
> -    delete these off the pop server (without downloading)
> -    now, the pop server has messages that i really want
> -    download these messages
> 
> anything in linux world that can do this?
> 
> - sandip
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
-- 
PGP: 0x4A34DD6D, http://bunny.sourceforge.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: