[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to run a command at startup



Christoph Hoenscheid wrote:
Hello Debian Users!!

Please be so kind and help me with my debian 3.0r0 installation. Just tell me what must I do to have the command "/sbin/route del default" run immediately after the system has booted. There is no "rc.local" avaialble and also no "/etc/sysconfig/network" like in Redheat. The default gateway is always set to sl0 when the sytem boots, but I never need sl0. I need ppp0 to be set as the default gateway when a connection is established, but this only happens if there is no default gateway set. In "/etc/network/interfaces" the sl0 device does not appear. The command "/sbin/route del default" resolves the problem very well, but I don't how to have it executed automatically and I don't know how to write a debian rc-script. Is there no configuration file where I can simply insert this command?

Thank You in advance!


Christoph

________________________________________________
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag



The "sl0" default route is a product of using diald. This is where it listens to determine if an outside connection needs to be established, and is "normal" when using diald. You really don't want to delete it unless you don't want to use the diald package. There are better ways to "fix" this, IMHO.


1. Read the docs on using diald and set your system up accordingly so that you will have a "dial on demand" config via diald.

2. Remove the diald package (apt-get remove diald). You can still setup a "dial on demand" function using the demand dialing option in pppd. This is setup via the pppconfig program and is located under the advanced options. I used this for a couple of years on my dial-up connection without problems, and I personally think it is easier to setup than diald. My knowledge is dated since I have had a Cable connection for the last year and a half... YMMV.

Cheers,
-Don Spoon-



Reply to: