Spam Filtering (was Re: Searching for Paul Johnson)
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:08:44 -0500 Gary Turner <kk5st@swbell.net> wrote:
> Amazing. Perhaps being on the system gives me some immunity :) In any
> case, I will still argue that the proper path is to route suspect email
> to an inspection area rather than an arbitrary bounce.
This is actually a very good reason for using Spam Assassin. By default
it's rules and criteria catch >95% of all the spam sent to my account, and
I've seen <1% false positives. All of which can be dealt with very
easily.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Reply to: