[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Searching for Paul Johnson



(Excuse me for using debian-user, but I know Paul reads the list and
it's at least somewhat Debian-related ...)

Paul,

Your system rejects mail from me. I hope it reached you by way of
154837-done@bugs.

Incidentally, following the link in the mail delivery error message, the
open relay test on tungsten.btinternet.com was performed from a host on
BT's own ADSL network! No wonder the test mail was accepted. You might
want to check if this blackhole list is often polluted in this way.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@btinternet.com> -----

X-Failed-Recipients: baloo@ursine.dyndns.org
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@btinternet.com>
To: cjwatson@flatline.org.uk
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:46:27 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0
	tests=URI_IS_POUND,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,
	      X_RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY
	version=2.31

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  baloo@ursine.dyndns.org
    SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>:
    host ursine.dyndns.org [12.241.220.214]: 550-http://dsbl.org/listing.php?194.73.73.81
    550 mail from 194.73.73.81 rejected: administrative prohibition (host is blacklisted)

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from host217-34-81-92.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.34.81.92] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
	by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 17ZcwF-00049T-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:45:47 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17ZcwE-0002sm-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:45:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:45:46 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>, 154837-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#154837: mplayer: mplayer isn't installable
Message-ID: <20020730194546.GA11067@riva.ucam.org>
References: <E17ZW4P-0003RH-00@ursine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E17ZW4P-0003RH-00@ursine>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@riva.ucam.org>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 05:25:45AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Package: mplayer
> Version: 0.18-4
> Severity: grave
> 
> ursine:/home/baloo# apt-get install mplayer
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   mplayer 
> 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
> Need to get 620kB of archives. After unpacking 1808kB will be used.
> Get:1 http://gul.uc3m.es potato/local mplayer 0.18-4 [620kB]

mplayer isn't in the Debian archive - not yet, at any rate. You'll need
to report this bug directly to whoever maintains the package.

(Isn't 0.18 quite an old version of mplayer, by the way?)

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

----- End forwarded message -----



Reply to: