[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: g++ 2.96 on debian?



On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 04:19:52PM +0200, Markus Grunwald wrote:
| On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
| "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com> wrote:
| 
| > >> Your best option is to go for 3.1.
| > > 
| > > but 3.1 is only in unstable! In testing it only goes till 3.0. How
| > > does compare 3.0 with 3.1?
| > 
| > 3.0 is reasonable, 3.1 just adds improvements in speed and
| > architecture support.
| 
| Using 3.0 with numeric calculations gave me tons of "nan" (not a
| number), when I used optimisation. Doesn't seem too reasonable to
| me...

Could it be that the order in which you did the operations and/or the
scale of the numbers you were working with caused overflows and such
in those cases?  It's just a thought ...

-D

-- 

Like a gold ring in a pig's snout
is a beautiful woman who shows no discretion.
        Proverbs 11:22
 
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/

Attachment: pgp9od8JaMd3g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: