On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:01:43 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com> wrote: > >> Your best option is to go for 3.1. > > > > but 3.1 is only in unstable! In testing it only goes till 3.0. How > > does compare 3.0 with 3.1? > > > > 3.0 is reasonable, 3.1 just adds improvements in speed and > architecture support. Using 3.0 with numeric calculations gave me tons of "nan" (not a number), when I used optimisation. Doesn't seem too reasonable to me... -- Markus Grunwald Registered Linux User Nr 101577 http://www.grunwald.2xs.de http://counter.li.org (hier pgp/gpg public key)
Attachment:
pgpOQdU3i5wCe.pgp
Description: PGP signature