[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Signatures



> I've also heard from several people that my sigs are coming across as
> broken or invalid.  Not sure why this is, they _do_ appear valid to me
> here virtually always.

Gpg (as run from evolution) says:

gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
gpg: armor header: Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan  3 23:11:26 2002 MST using DSA key ID
55F2B9B0
gpg: BAD signature from "Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>"

While we're on the topic, how's mine look?

Attachment: pgphgIXAAg6dk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: