on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:39:59PM -0700, Jeremy Nickurak (atrus@rifetech.com) wrote: > > > I've also heard from several people that my sigs are coming across as > > broken or invalid. Not sure why this is, they _do_ appear valid to me > > here virtually always. > > Gpg (as run from evolution) says: > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > gpg: armor header: Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 3 23:11:26 2002 MST using DSA key ID > 55F2B9B0 > gpg: BAD signature from "Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>" > > While we're on the topic, how's mine look? Golden. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free We freed Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
Attachment:
pgpmuX8r4Dw3_.pgp
Description: PGP signature