pirmin <pirmin2@gmx.net> writes: >> On 18 Dec 2001, Vineet Kumar wrote: > >> I recently bought an Epson Perfection 1650 which is working perfectly > > I am impressed by an Epson 1640 Perfections's speed at work in a Win2k > environment, connectted to the USB port. In the vendors' lists they > now have the 1650s. > > Is the 1650 also very fast? I did not take a stopwatch onsite but the > my decision threshold in favor of scanning some document has lowered > considerably in contrast to my attitude towards using a not too slow > Umax Astra 1220 SCSI at home. The Epson hardly gives me the impression > I am waiting for the scan to be completed. I just took out the stop watch for two sample scans of four 35mm negatives using the tpu on my 1650photo: 1. 3200dpi, totalling a whopping 171.6MB took 682 seconds (ca. 260kB/s) 2. 300dpi, totalling 1.5MB took 73 seconds (ca. 21kB/s) Both times were measured by hand from pressing start in xsane until the carrier in the scanner returns (so, no conversion time included). Hope it helps. -- Tschoe, http://gecius.de/gpg-key.txt - Fingerprint: Jens 1AAB 67A2 1068 77CA 6B0A 41A4 18D4 A89B 28D0 F097
Attachment:
pgpW5swOmE5aG.pgp
Description: PGP signature