Re: Sparc Linux?
Thus spake Noah Meyerhans (noahm@debian.org):
> > We're currently playing with the Suse version because the guy who
> > started this heard the debian version doesn't work on anything better
> > than a Clasic very well.
>
> I can't help but wonder where they heard that. Suse and Debian are both
> Linux (yes, I know, we're hurd, too, don't nitpick!) so I don't see how
> Linux would work better if Suse's distribution was running on top of it
> than if Debian's distribution is running on top of it.
What if something like apache had a VERY old version for sparc linux where
suse had an up to date, patched package? I think that was the main
issue.
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | Micros~1 :
Senior System Engineer | For when quality, reliability
at RnD Consulting | and security just aren't
\_ that important!
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
FYI:
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
Reply to: