[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [users] Mail from OE to linux and more



On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:33:59PM -0500, Brendan O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2001 12:56, will trillich wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:50:51PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> > > On 07/09/01 02:31:03 -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> > > > I'm yet another person who'd love to completely transition from Windows
> > > > to Linux. And yes, I use Outlook and yes, getting mail really working
> > > > on Linux is the biggest obstacle to my completing the transition.
> > >
> > > Yeah, mail is pretty important. I'm in the process of documenting my
> > > mail setup experience to share with others.
> >
> > ding! did someone mention my name? oh, that's right, yuo're
> > DOCUMENTING something. excellent!
> >
> > 	http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/
> > 	needs more folks like you.
> >
> > and now we return you to your regularly scheduled email...
> >
> > :)
> 
> I recently spent some time with interfacing kmail and fetchmail.  Normally, 
> kmail can handle both ingoing and outgoing mailings (just like Outlook or 
> Eudora), which I feel is the easiest for newbies (or lazy ppl like myself) 
> but the current version doesn't have SSL support, so I had to configure 
> fetchmail with it.  There's certainly a zillion ways to do email on Linux, 
> but if you want a little wrtie-up on this minor one, drop me an email...

consider it dropped. (not the subject, just an email. :)

newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...hmm... email/ ? awaits your
efforts!

-- 
DEBIAN NEWBIE TIP #59 from Will Trillich <will@serensoft.com> 
:
Wanting to SYNCHRONIZE YOUR SYSTEM CLOCK periodically? If you
think your system clock gathers or loses a few extra seconds
each day, you're probably looking for "ntpdate" which queries
several "network time protocol" servers, and sets your system
clock accordingly.
	apt-get install ntpdate ntp-doc
then browse /usr/share/doc/ntp-doc/html for info.

Also see http://newbieDoc.sourceForge.net/ ...



Reply to: