Re: Some logs... I don't understand this...
-> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel de los Reyes <dadecal@s2-selling.com>,
-> debian-user@lists.debian.org
if you are member of debian-users, please put
subscribe debian-users@lists.debian.org
to your .muttrc not to insert Mail-Followup-To for you
-> Now, this is what I get from running proftp in foreground and debug level 5.
->
-> The machine attempting the connection is a win machine with an IP address of 192.168.1.3 and is behind a Linux box doing IP-Masquerading with IP 62.42.25.105. I don't understand those starnge logs at the end about the port stuff...
->
-> router (VA1-1G-u-0359.mc.onolab.com[62.42.25.104]) - connected - local : 62.42.23.101:2100
-> router (VA1-1G-u-0359.mc.onolab.com[62.42.25.104]) - connected - remote : 62.42.25.104:61093
-> router (VA1-1G-u-0359.mc.onolab.com[62.42.25.104]) - received: PORT 192,168,1,3,4,65
-> router (VA1-1G-u-0359.mc.onolab.com[62.42.25.104]) - Refused PORT 192,168,1,3,4,65 (address mismatch).
-> router (VA1-1G-u-0359.mc.onolab.com[62.42.25.104]) - FTP session closed.
those machines connect from IP 62.42.23.101 and want FTP server to connect
to 192.168.1.3 - no wonder FTP server refuses it. can you ping or traceroute
that ip (192.168.1.3) ? if so, there's a problem and FTP server should allow
it (check www.proftpd.net for docs). If not, seems that's client problem
did you say there is no firewall ? interesting how did those machines come
to IP 192.168.blah...
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, sysadmin at NEXTRA, Slovakia; IRCNET admin of *.sk
uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ ; http://www.nextra.sk/
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
Reply to: