Re: Woody Progress

To: Debian-User Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Woody Progress
From: Quietman <quietman@lamont.cysoft.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 03:03:12 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001206030312.B689@lamont.cysoft.net>
Mail-followup-to: Quietman <quietman@lamont.cysoft.net>, Debian-User Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 00ca01c05e16$561ff400$0101a8c0@home>; from raphael@russe.dhs.org on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:19:19PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 852569AB.00547938.00@andmail1.andersonsinc.com> <[🔎] 00ca01c05e16$561ff400$0101a8c0@home>

On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:19:19PM +0100, Raphael Deimel wrote:

> btw. woody is unstable, so 2.4.0 will probably be the standard-kernel very
> soon
How do you come to that conclusion?

Cheers,
Tom

-- 
Houdini escaping from New Jersey!

Film at eleven.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Woody Progress
  - From: "Scott Patterson" <Scott_Patterson@andersonsinc.com>
- Re: Woody Progress
  - From: "Raphael Deimel" <raphael@russe.dhs.org>

Prev by Date: Kernel config questions: SCSI, Tux and letters
Next by Date: Re: kernel panic
Previous by thread: Re: Woody Progress
Next by thread: Re: Woody Progress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread