Re: More problems compiling kernel
Wayne Topa dixit:
~>
~> Subject: Re: Help! More problems compiling kernel
~> Date: Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 02:43:38PM +0200
~>
~> In reply to:homega@vlc.servicom.es
~>
~> ln -s kernel-source-2.0.35 linux
~> >
~> ls -l should show you that linux -----> points to kernel-source-2.0.35
~>
~> > cd \linux *** without the link (ln -s ) there isn't a linux
~> dir after you did the mv linux kernel-source-2.0.35
I forgot to write it down here, but I surely did it. I've found many problems,
downloaded kernels from different places (.gz and .bz2), fixed myself wrong
headers (probably corrupted due to line noise and/or during source installation)
... Finally I got one error message about the compiler, so I've decided to
upgrade as much as I can.
I've downloaded (from Slink):
bin86_0.14.3-1.deb (and I already have binutils_2.9.1-0.2 installed)
cpp_2.7.2.3-7.deb (BTW, what's cpp_2.91.66-0slink1_alpha.deb from proposed
upgrades?)
gcc_2.7.2.3-7.deb
gcc-docs_2.7.2.3-7.deb
glibc-doc_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
make_3.77-4.deb
make-doc_3.77-4.deb
I hope there's nothing else missing, and not having any trouble upgrading all
that load. I've also tried to upgrade gdb (I've got 4.17-0.1), but haven't
been able to find it.
It would be much better to upgrade to Slink at once, but I've been waiting for
more than a month for LSL to deliver the CDs.
One final question... following /usr/src/linux/README instructions, I removed
asm/, linux/, and scsi/ from /usr/include/ and remade them as symlinks to
asm-i386/, linux/, and scsi/ in /usr/src/linux/include/linux/ ... but if I now
removed the kernel source... what will it be? orphan symlinks? will that be a
problem?
Horacio
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver
o/or
Envía un mensaje vacío a homega@vlc.servicom.es con la línea de asunto:
Send a blank message to homega@vlc.servicom.es with the subject line:
Tipo de Clave/Key Type Asunto:/Subject:
DSA/ElGamal fetch dsa/elgamal
DSS/Diffie-Hellman fetch dh/dss
RSA fetch rsa
Reply to: