[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mail and mailer questions



I recently answered a similar question:

-----------------8<------------------

On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 18:54:35 EST, Shaleh wrote:
> I am using a modem and ppp to login to my ISP.  What is a good setup for
> e-mail???  Currently I use NS4's e-mail but it is a little buggy and
> crashes often.  I would like to have a nice X front end.  I currently
> recieve between 250 and 350 e-mails a day and am logged in via modem
> sporadically at best.

exmh is popular, I like it, it has never crashed on me, it has lots of 
nice features, and it is packaged for both bo and hamm.

  exmh home page
  http://www.beedub.com/exmh/

exmh is a tcl/tk frontend to MH or nmh (so you'll need MH or nmh too), 
and I'd recommend running procmail to sort your mail, and fetchmail to 
get your mail, and smail to send mail, assuming dialup networking.

If this sounds a little more involved than configuring netscape, it is, 
however I think you'll find the added functionality worthwhile in the 
long run.

I configured fetchmail and promail mostly using the documentation 
available in the package (man, info, /usr/doc/*), however some online 
procmail resources were also helpful for fine tuning:

  http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~ian/procmail.html
  http://www.ssc.com/lg/issue14/procmail.html
  http://www.helsinki.fi/~reriksso/procmail/mini-faq.html
  http://www.helsinki.fi/~reriksso/procmail/links.html

The primary obstacle to overcome with smail is rewriting headers and 
making them stick during smtp posts.  I like Daniel Martin's solution, 
but there are both simpler and more complex methods:

  http://www.math.jhu.edu/~martind/mybox.html

Coincidentally, I recommend you follow the recent advice regarding MH 
configuration:

  http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-user-9803/msg01287.html

More good MH resources:

  http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/faq/usenet/mail/mh-faq/part1/f
aq.html
  http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mh/book/

Exmh itself is pretty easy to configure, has a gui for most 
configuration, help menu (in 2.x version) which includes faq and 
mailing lists subscription.

-----------------8<----------------------

Additionally, you asked for was a text mode email client and mentioned 
mailbox styles, and there are at least several of each.

Originally, my mail configuration was setup to work with mutt 
(my preferred text-mode email client) and exmh (preferred X-windows), 
however my mutt configuration is no longer. I believe my mutt was 
disavowed sometime amidst my hamm upgrade due to a long outstanding 
dependency.  The original idea was that mutt and exmh both called on 
smail's post command

Anyways, I just reinstalled mutt, and assigned my exmh inbox to be 
used, sent and received mail, and looked at my headers, and the 
Return-Path: field was correctly set, although the From: field 
apparently needs to be configured a little better because I used the 
example ~/.muttrc (properly modified) and html manual in /usr/doc, 
however sending to my isp account I get:

  From: unknown@u.washington.edu (kotsya: David Stern)

If anyone knows what causes this, please post list and/or me.

Anyways, Mutt has a very advanced feature list, and if you want pgp 
integration, you'll have to get the non-us version from 
nonus.debian.org (that's what someone said last night, I haven't tried 
it).

The one thing mutt uses by default that I'm not comfortable with (yet) 
is vi, but this can be configured to another editor (I chose pico) in 
~/.muttrc or in the EDITOR environment variable.  There was also an 
interesting thread re: vi last night.  I intend to learn vi, ultimately.

-- 
David Stern                          
------------------------------------------------------------------
                             http://weber.u.washington.edu/~kotsya
                                           kotsya@u.washington.edu




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: