Re: HELP: Got in security trouble.
> However, if those of us who like to think of ourselves as
> hackers in the traditional sense of the word (and I;m talking
> computer tradition) take exception to your lumping us with egregious
> criminal miscreants, and flame you to a crisp, would that be fine
> too?
Never did I lump hackers with "egregious criminal miscreants." I merely
took the objective point of view and was explaining how/why the "outside
world" may see what a hacker is. I repeatedly explained that I
disagreed with the improper use of the term "hacker," yet you still
lump me with the outside world. Please don't accuse me of something I
never did.
> Ossama> (This is just a preventative measure on my part so that I
> Ossama> don`t nailed with flames...heh.)
>
> Too late.
IMHO, I shouldn't have been flamed to begin with. There is a difference
with being objective and actually stating that something or someone is
wrong. It is unfortunate that you failed to notice my objectivity.
-Ossama
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: