Re: *-* auto-upgrade from rex to hamm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998 lucier@bossie.cow-net.com wrote:
> Fairly newcomer to Linux here, so hope you (or anyone else) wouldn't mind
> answering a couple of basic questions for me:
Nothing to be ashamed! I'm a newcomer, too.
> does rex = rexx (script language found in OS/2 amongst others)
> What are hamm and bo?
The name "rex" does not mean "Rexx". Rexx is in fact a script language,
which is found in nearly every IBM operating system from OS/2 over OS/400
to VM/MVS. The name "rex" is the "code name" for the Debian GNU/Linux
Version 1.2.x. While "bo" is Version 1.3.x, and "hamm" is 2.?? (2.0.x or
2.1.x - I don't know how they will name it).
The code name are easier to remember and to pronouce than the version
numbers. I think this was all about it.
Bye
Daniel
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - Daniel Gross <dg@bingo.baynet.de> -
- - Ingolstadt, Germany <dgross@gmx.net> -
- - "If Win95 is the answer, it must have been a real foolish question !" -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.
iQEVAwUBNMTijAnLrgqPNGtBAQHAPAgAjMi2hM854kZHA2YZAA7G9Dpb06rjxD+9
lo9P4v/+n4K1g7pMp10GTbyDCCMLERh+5J7+MPyO0TvU1iKS68v5Arunx92YWJGG
KRcRuAjxUNbv9Y1pAHqRWZHoXA9owszKSppucz71m0msF/yBZYart/S+BDYq+FvX
TbSJxybc/AUyuWvsJoH0QMul2HlKrDdfYAMlIZldxGr4ZCvhAufvIGbwopDf8Onp
VRyG1ANYkmMYNYzaIlCvHmvJFF3lkJu6Q9V9yQoIhkHsTtrcitejpUBAPpbxrkwY
Sh4NZd6dNHF8KXmslSJDR73uPAboWY7mOpul5CY9Ti1TbwcS7rT5vg==
=4HWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: