Re: Problem with Smail
On Mar 19, Alexander Koch wrote
> So you may see what Mutt is like. But you should be careful. I'd say:
> stick with the Debian- MUTT- Package and you're fine. It's not as news as
> the real MUTT but it _works_ (believe me, it's a bit tricky to make it
It is. Due to unclarity wrt ITAR for packages with hooks for crypto, such as
mutt, the Debian mutt packages resides on debian-non-US sites nowadays. I've
reported a bug against ftp.debian.org to get the old package removed.
> work sometimes).
Basically, the Debian mutt package is simply the latest non-developer
release (i.e. one announced on mutt-announce), with all bugfix patches that
apply cleanly, and a matching Muttrc.
> Otherwise if you install it by hand and want to use it, you are better off
> following the mutt-users mailing list, there're still too much bugfixes and
> expermintal patches flying around. Remember: MUTT is still alpha software!
> Well, besides the point ELM 2.5 beta is _without_ PGP support at all
> there's only one choice for me. And please don't mention PINE, thanks. ,-)
The Debian elm-me+ package has PGP support.
Greetings,
Ray
--
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.
Reply to: