[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: passage de hda IDE -> SATA



Naha a écrit, mardi 13 février 2007, à 21:14 :
> Jacques L'helgoualc'h a écrit :
[...]
> > Ceux-là, je ne sais pas.  Il me semble qu'un certain Linus T.  le
> > déconseille ?
>
> Ah ? C'est du genre de « les gnomistes sont des nazis de l'interface »,

:/

> ou il y a une vraie raison ?

Google « "Linus Torvalds" dump restore » => 68 900 réponses
J'ai de la chance --> http://linuxfr.org/tips/38.html

2ème lien, plus complet,
 http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/fr/admin-guide/s1-disaster-rhlspec.html
 [explications en v.f.]

Suivent Les Saintes Écritures, en v.o.

  From: Linus  Torvalds To: Neil Conway  Subject: Re: [PATCH]  SMP race in
  ext2 - metadata corruption.  Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
  Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel At vger Dot kernel Dot org>

  [ linux-kernel added back as a cc ]

  On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Neil Conway wrote:
  > > I'm surprised that dump is deprecated (by you at least ;-)).  What to
  > use instead for backups on machines that can't umount disks regularly?


  Note that dump simply won't work reliably at all even in 2.4.x: the buffer
  cache and the page cache (where all the actual data is) are not
  coherent. This is only going to get even worse in 2.5.x, when the
  directories are moved into the page cache as well.

  So anybody who depends on "dump" getting backups right is already playing
  Russian roulette with their backups.  It's not at all guaranteed to get the
  right results - you may end up having stale data in the buffer cache that
  ends up being "backed up".

  Dump was a stupid program in the first place. Leave it behind.

  > I've always thought "tar" was a bit undesirable (updates atimes or
  > ctimes for example).

  Right now, the cpio/tar/xxx solutions are definitely the best ones, and
  will work on multiple filesystems (another limitation of "dump"). Whatever
  problems they have, they are still better than the _guaranteed_(*)  data
  corruptions of "dump".

  However, it may be that in the long run it would be advantageous to have a
  "filesystem maintenance interface" for doing things like backups and
  defragmentation..

          Linus

  (*) Dump may work fine for you a thousand times. But it _will_ fail under
  the right circumstances. And there is nothing you can do about it.


Bon, tout le monde n'est pas du même avis, cf.

 http://dump.sourceforge.net/isdumpdeprecated.html

mais,  maudit soit  Murphy jusqu'à  la  42ième génération,  je suis  sûr
d'oublier de me méfier la 1001 ème fois...


Ah oui, j'ai aussi oublié de parler de cpio.
-- 
Jacques L'helgoualc'h



Reply to: