Re: Patch to make texlive-new work
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> So IF we do something for etch, then texlive-bin and texlive-extra would
> make sense ... but this can also be done from the current texlive-new
> layout.
I suggest to genereate packages either way and compare the debs with
debdiff.
> All of these changes are non invasive at all, and the changes to
> texlive-bin fix some regression which might be stupid, especially the
> missing ttf2afm!
>
> For texlive-extra it would be nice to have these fixes in etch, too, but
> who knows ... does it make sense to build packges and ask -release?
I think we should try. Maybe the changelog entries could be reworded -
I fear some don't make much sense to someone who's not familiar with TeX
or even our update-* mechanisms and dh_installtex.
> Anyway, I am away till the 2 January, so either someone else or I will
> do it when I am back.
I'll be away the whole first week of January, and after that I'll
probably have a backlog both at work and in my "job applications"
folder.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: