Re: Meta-package to replace tetex-extra
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> In other words, we need to urge maintainers of documentation packages
> to add a texlive-lang-* dependency for each language they add to their
> docs. I think this is a disadvantage of texlive as a tool for automated
> documentation processing, but I don't see any way out.
Well, is there any real point not turning on most patterns by default,
as is the case in teTeX? If not, why not do the same for TeX Live?
Probably some texlive-lang-* packages would then become useless; they
could be removed from the archive---I don't see it as a problem.
--
Florent
Reply to: