Re: lenny release goals and the tetex->texlive transition
Frank Küster wrote:
> Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
>> As I said, I vote for the transitional packages, and that move should be
>> done immediately after etch released.
>
> Before we do that, we should check
>
> - whether everything in tetex-base + tetex-bin is included in the
> texlive metapackage. I can imagine that some style has been installed
> in -base, but is in tl-latex-extra. If we find this, we should try to
> get an idea whether any build-depending package might use this.
>
> - whether we can specify a decent list of texlive packages on which the
> tetex-extra transitional package depends on. If this ends up to be
> 2/3 of texlive-full, it's not practical.
The following ought to be useful to answer these questions:
http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/tetex-to-texlive-mapping/
I mentioned it before on this list, but maybe it was forgotten...
To specifically answer the first question above, tetex-base includes
five files that are installed to texlive-latex-extra, only one of which
is a style file. Those are:
u/s/t-t/fonts/source/public/esint/bigint.mf
u/s/t-t/fonts/source/public/esint/esint10.mf
u/s/t-t/fonts/source/public/esint/mathint.mf
u/s/t-t/makeindex/nomencl.ist
u/s/t-t/tex/generic/localloc/localloc.sty
(u = /usr, s = share, t-t = texmf-tetex)
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
Reply to: