[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The hated xmltex/jadetex games in combination with new tex-common

Hi Frank!

On Mit, 23 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> - there are at least two bugs, one in jadetex and one in
> tex-common/TeXlive-Upstream. 


> which it shouldn't. The problem is that jadetex is based on latex, but
> progname is jadetex:
> frank@sid:~$ kpsewhich -progname=latex fonttext.cfg
> /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fonttext.cfg
> frank@sid:~$ kpsewhich -progname=jadetex fonttext.cfg
> /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/cslatex/base/fonttext.cfg


> -TEXINPUTS.jadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,plain,generic,}//
> +TEXINPUTS.jadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,latex,plain,generic,}//
> (this is the bug in jadetex).  The other bug is in tex-common: It has
> entries for the TEXINPUTS paths for the formats that are in separate
> packages: 
> $ grep jadetex /etc/texmf/texmf.d/{1,4}5*    
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/15Plain.cnf:TEXINPUTS.jadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,plain,generic,}//
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf:TEXINPUTS.pdfjadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,plain,generic,}//

What about removing them??? Wouldn't this be the ideal/normal/default

> Furthermore, the jadetex package should drop the pdftex toplevel
> directory, since it is never used.


All the changes are in jadetex 3.13-6.2 which can be found at the usual
	deb-(src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
all lintian/linda clean.

The changelog:
jadetex (3.13-6.2) unstable; urgency=low

  * NMU
  * change fmtutil line to not load the latex format, but put the loading of
    latex.ini into jadetex.ini and pdfjadetex.ini
  * add alternative dependencies on texlive
  * switch to dh_installtex
  * remove fmt generation code in postinst
  * remove prerm file as this is done by dh_installtex
  * add latex in the search path
  * bump standards version to 3.7.2, no changes necessary
  * move debhelper from build-deps-indep to build-deps
  * drop useless pdftex path component from TEXINPUTS.jadetex

 -- Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>  Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:20:00 +0200

I know I have again done quite a lot of restructuring, but I thought
this is the easiest way to get compliance with the TeX policy.

I attach a diff between unpacked 3.13-6 and 3.13-6.2.

What do we do with this? Should we ask the maintainer whether he
approves the NMU, or should I send him the stuff (as for pgf) and hope
he is doing this?

> 2c::/tmp/buildd/texlive-bin-2005.dfsg.1/build/inst/texmf/web2c:/tmp/buildd/texlive-bin-2005.dfsg.1/build/inst/texmf/web2

How to change this? I don't necessarily want to dig into the
configure.in/Makefile.in hell....

> It looks very wrong to me that the build directory is in the search path.

How did you solve this in tetex?

Best wishes


Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
You're bound to be unhappy if you optimize everything.
 			--- Donald E. Knuth

Reply to: