Re: new lmodern package
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 19:50 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@physik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >>
> >> If it's ready for an upload - has anybody tested upgrading from sarge?
> >
> > Not yet. But what 'sarge' do you mean? 'Real sarge' or 'sarge with teTeX
> > 3.0'?
>
> I meant real sarge, but it wouldn't hurt to try with backports, too.
Reconsidering my question, one does need tex-common and hence teTeX 3
for these tests. Anyway, I have now tested 0.92-7 -> 0.99.3-1 and 0.92-7
-> 0.92-11 -> 0.99.3-1 updates. Unfortunately, I get the message
Configuration file `/etc/texmf/updmap.d/10lmodern.cfg'
==> File on system created by you or by a script.
==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
What would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
[...]
in both cases when updating from 0.92-7. It seems as if there is
something wrong in the preinst code checking 10lmodern.cfg. I haven't
found the reason yet, though.
BTW, I haven't tested with texlive-context yet. And there is a small
error in the current packages. Instead of
cork-ec.enc -> lm-ec.enc
one needs
cork-lm.enc -> lm-ec.enc
in /usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/.
cheerio
ralf
Reply to: