Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"

To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:24:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87psgw2ukt.fsf@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 868xnk5sa8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> ( Frank Küster's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2006 08:45:35 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 878xnu6q5q.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 86slm1muvg.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 87hd2h8rrz.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 8664ixmqik.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 87k67duo4h.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 8764ixun8l.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 867j3cfhef.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 87irmwrp59.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 20060620124450.GG12405@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] 864pyferr6.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 87r71jhk8q.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 87u06fg16t.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 87k676eouk.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 868xnk5sa8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

>> Is it OK to upload tex-common again to have this fix in the archive?
>
> No problem here (except that maybe you did that already while I was
> hiking in the Alps...)

No, will do right now...

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dvips35.map disappearing from ls-R after force-purge-then-reinstall of tex-common
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>

References:
- Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
Next by Date: Re: dvips35.map disappearing from ls-R after force-purge-then-reinstall of tex-common
Previous by thread: Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
Next by thread: Re: dvips35.map disappearing from ls-R after force-purge-then-reinstall of tex-common
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread