Re: SVN lmodern commit: r1203 - in lmodern/trunk/debian: . sed_scripts
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 14:23 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> So I took a look into the afm file and what do I find in lmr10.afm:
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N three.oldstyle ; B 42 -216 457 472 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N four.oldstyle ; B 28 -194 471 483 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N five.oldstyle ; B 50 -216 449 472 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N six.oldstyle ; B 42 -22 457 666 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N seven.oldstyle ; B 56 -216 485 482 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N eight.oldstyle ; B 42 -22 457 666 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N nine.oldstyle ; B 42 -216 457 472 ;
> ...
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N zerooldstyle ; B 39 -22 460 453 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N oneoldstyle ; B 90 1 420 454 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N twooldstyle ; B 43 1 449 453 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N threeoldstyle ; B 42 -216 457 472 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N fouroldstyle ; B 28 -194 471 483 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N fiveoldstyle ; B 50 -216 449 472 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N sixoldstyle ; B 42 -22 457 666 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N sevenoldstyle ; B 56 -216 485 482 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N eightoldstyle ; B 42 -22 457 666 ;
> C -1 ; WX 500 ; N nineoldstyle ; B 42 -216 457 472 ;
This duplication is rather odd, but in principle legal. Unfortunately my
mail from this morning hasn't shown up on the list yet (that happens
quite often for me these days, strange ...). However, I am menawhile
sure that the (legal) dots in the glyphnames are causing the problems.
Here is an extreme example:
http://www.tfkp.physik.uni-erlangen.de/~ralf/debian/xfontsel-minion.png
> Maybe the three.oldstyle etc are somehow disturbing xfontsel, but
> gfontview seems to be alright with it.
IIRC gfontview uses t1lib, not the methods provided by X11. And I am
pretty sure that this is an X11 bug, not a bug in the fonts.
cheerio
ralf
Reply to: