On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 13:21 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> wrote: > > > I find we are discussing uneasy questions (where we basically need to > > predict the future of texmf.cnf) for a possible gain that looks minimal > > to me: here, running updmap-sys takes ages compared to mktexlsr. > > Yes. Here too. Ok, I am convinced. Let's keep it simple and just call mktexlsr. cheerio ralf