Re: lmodern package ready for teTeX 3 and upgrades from sarge
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
>> Would it make sense to provide a file in tex-common defining these
>> variables that could simply be 'sourced' in the maintainer scripts?
>
> Hm, well.
I find we are discussing uneasy questions (where we basically need to
predict the future of texmf.cnf) for a possible gain that looks minimal
to me: here, running updmap-sys takes ages compared to mktexlsr. Did we
ever get complaints from those "power users" that updating their local
ls-R files from time to time really took too much time?
--
Florent
Reply to: