Bug#87699: tetex-bin: Please don't. A "suggests" and possibly a warning on install is better
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug#87699: tetex-bin: Please don't. A "suggests" and possibly a warning on install is better
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:43:25 +0900
> The problem is that even for well maintained programs,
> noone noticed the problem.
>
> This is very difficult to detect that there is a problem at all
> until someone does a clean chroot build (like with pbuilder).
Yes, it is true. But it seems (at least to me) general problem
that to find out sufficient Build-Depends is difficult.
> That is why I keep on recommending to keep depends, do
> debian-devel-announce, and then remove the dependency in woody+1.
..
> I am hoping that you are getting my message.
> "Other packages are broken" is not a reason. tetex-bin broke it
> in the first place.
I have an impression that you are too involved in something like
autobuilder (or pbuilder etc. etc....).
I hope you restrict arguments to the current particular issue.
I still can't see any good reason to set fake dependency to
tetex-bin.
Best regards, 2002.3.6
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: