[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bylaws in English



Hi Marc!

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:13:08 +0100, Marc Fournier wrote:
> Excerpts from Luca Capello's message of Fri Feb 24 15:57:25 +0100 2012:
>> [...]
>> AFAIK no, but yesterday I forgot to say that at FOSDEM I was approached
>> by Debian France, which is currently *not* a Debian Trusted Organization
>> <http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution#item-9>, but it would like to
>> become one.  Thus, they asked me about a French version of the bylaws as
>> a starting point for theirs.
>
> AFAIK the requirements to start an organization in France are not 100% the
> same than in Switzerland. They will probably want to set up an "association
> loi 1901", and it seems this type of organization needs to be declared to
> the authorities if it plans to shuffle money around. This would be quite a
> fundamental difference with the debian.ch organization.

FYI, their association exists already:

  <http://france.debian.net/>

  L'Association Debian France est une association de droit local
  Alsace-Moselle inscrite au Registre des Associations auprès du
  Tribunal d'Instance de Colmar (68, Haut-Rhin) sous les références :
  Volume 60, Folio N° 89 en date du 25/09/2006 (publication légale :
  Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace N° 229 en date du 29/09/2006). 

> What I want to say is that we probably won't be able to share much of our
> swiss bylaws (in a copy-paste sense). They can merely take inspiration from
> them, for which an english version should be sufficient.
>
> We can also provide them with a loose french translation, if they don't
> want to wait until a formal english translation is available (I can take
> care of this translation if requested).

As far as I understood, most of their interest was in how we define
membership and not really in how the association is organized according
to the laws.

Anyway, I will send another email as soon as they will come back to us.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Attachment: pgpJhtPwIWmst.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: