On 06/10/14 at 09:51 +0000, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > i am a bit unhappy with that change, i can understand your move though. > See reason below. > > On Mon Oct 06, 2014 at 10:53:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I also used that opportunity to update the wiki page so that it reads: > > > > As a general rule, '''no reimbursement requests will be processed if > > requested more than three months after the corresponding event''' > > (sprint, purchase, etc). > > > > (diff: "1 year" -> "three months") > > > > Clarifications: > > - It's three months starting from the time when you can start asking > > for reimbursement. For sprints, it's when your travel is completed, > > not when you initially bought tickets. For hardware purchases, I > > don't mind if it's when the hardware is delivered or even set up, > > if there are doubts about whether it will work, for example. > > FFIS insists in the original paper receipts. Every snail mail letter to > FFIS costs me 55¢. While this is not much, with your change the number > of letters i need to send raises for me. > > I tend to mail leader@, auditor@ and ffis immidiatly after the expense, > but tend to collect the receipts for a while and then send a bunch of > them to FFIS. Can we keep it that way, even if the time distance > between two letters to FFIS is like... 6 months or so? Yes, I agree that this is a case where it make sense to consolidate reimbursement requests to save on the mailing costs. Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature