[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sparc status ?



Hi,

Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> >>I have no clue why is it marked oldkernel something related to the buildd ?
> >>
> >The debian.org sparc machines do not work reliably with recent kernels.
> >That is not sustainable.

Not only them. All my Sparcs run Squeeze kernels, too, because neither
Wheezy (3.2) nor Sid kernels (3.12 was the last one I tried IIRC) can
provide uptimes more than a month. Sometimes they freeze just after a
few days of uptime. Since I'm back on 2.6.32, I never had issues
again. Current uptime 92 days.

Example uprecords:

>From a Sparc installed with Sid in autumn 2013:

     #               Uptime | System                                     Boot up
----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
->   1    92 days, 20:22:44 | Linux 2.6.32-5-sparc64-s  Sat Jan 25 21:38:13 2014
     2    24 days, 09:18:08 | Linux 3.10-2-sparc64-smp  Sat Sep  7 16:16:29 2013
     3     5 days, 23:12:41 | Linux 3.12-trunk-sparc64  Fri Nov 29 04:12:01 2013
     4     4 days, 01:35:01 | Linux 3.12-trunk-sparc64  Sat Dec  7 15:32:05 2013
     5     2 days, 22:44:57 | Linux 3.12-trunk-sparc64  Mon Jan 20 21:36:35 2014
     6     2 days, 14:21:37 | Linux 3.10-3-sparc64-smp  Wed Oct  2 04:16:49 2013
     7     1 day , 15:14:57 | Linux 2.6.32-5-sparc64-s  Tue Jan 19 04:14:07 2038
----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

>From a Sparc running Wheezy since July 2013, stripped to those uptimes
since the upgrade to Wheezy:

    14     0 days, 00:19:43 | Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64     Mon Jul 15 12:22:26 2013
    15     0 days, 00:53:29 | Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64     Mon Jul 15 13:14:06 2013
    16     0 days, 00:07:17 | Linux 3.2.0-4-sparc64     Mon Jul 15 14:10:26 2013
    17   209 days, 21:29:54 | Linux 2.6.32-5-sparc64    Mon Jul 15 14:18:30 2013
->  18    77 days, 07:11:40 | Linux 2.6.32-5-sparc64    Mon Feb 10 10:50:23 2014

The latter has not much load, it's just an NTP server.

> On my V240, the 3.13 kernel seems to be rock solid (I've been
> rebuilding the gcc package 3 times - 8hours build - without any
> issue).

It's good to hear that there are least some hardware architectures
where recent kernels are more stable than on all my UltraSparcs.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5


Reply to: