On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:36:31PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > vore is an UltraSPARC II 300Mhz, with 512 MB of RAM, so I doubt that we > can upgrade a part to make it faster, except the processor. It is not > able to follow unstable, I would say it could build 80/90% of the > packages. ok, and what kind of machine is it? depending on the model i could find a 450 mhz cpu..., or, if that is any better, i have a U10@450mhz with 512Mb ram and two reasonable fast disks that i could theoretically spare > I don't know a lot about mrpurply, but looking at the logs, it seems it > is the same kind of hardware (maybe a bit slower) than vore. can't find it now but wasn't someone offering a much faster machine just a few weeks ago? > So that would say the only problem is to make the buildd running 24x7. I > have seen that vore and auric are running 2.6.12 kernels. Does the > instability comes from there? AFAIK there is no stability problem with > the kernels from sarge. Maybe the machine could use them. hmm, what kind of stability issues are this? i run 2.6.12 and 2.4.something on two machines and never encountered any problems... cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature