[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: saving sparc for etch requalification

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:45:33AM -0700, Ben Collins wrote:
> Wow, let's just stretch the meaning to burden things even more. "Needs two
> buildd's", but wait "two machines isn't enough".

as far as i see it (which isn't very far) auric is having problems, vore
is considered to be too weak to count as a full buildd, and some new
buildd is in the works. the new buildd is probably able to keep up by
itself, so the only problem is the redundancy. judging from what
db.d.o says vore isn't very fast, but it *should* be able to keep up.
perhaps vore could be beefed up with a bit more memory or more/faster
spindles? what hardware exactly is vore?

cu  robert

Robert Lemmen                               http://www.semistable.com 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: