On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:45:33AM -0700, Ben Collins wrote: > Wow, let's just stretch the meaning to burden things even more. "Needs two > buildd's", but wait "two machines isn't enough". as far as i see it (which isn't very far) auric is having problems, vore is considered to be too weak to count as a full buildd, and some new buildd is in the works. the new buildd is probably able to keep up by itself, so the only problem is the redundancy. judging from what db.d.o says vore isn't very fast, but it *should* be able to keep up. perhaps vore could be beefed up with a bit more memory or more/faster spindles? what hardware exactly is vore? cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature